Five Eyes
The intelligence alliance of the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, who share signals intelligence so completely it arguably binds them tighter than NATO.

Five Eyes is the closest intelligence alliance in the world: an arrangement under which the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand pool their signals intelligence and share it almost without reservation. Five English-speaking democracies, five spy agencies, one common take. No other group of sovereign states trusts one another with their secrets to anything like this degree, which is why analysts often argue it binds its members more tightly than any formal treaty, NATO included.
From wartime handshake to standing pact
The alliance grew out of World War II, when American and British codebreakers, the people who cracked Enigma and the Japanese naval codes, learned to share their most sensitive product. They formalized it after the war in the UKUSA Agreement, signed in 1946, a secret so closely held that its very existence was not officially acknowledged until the full text was declassified in 2010. Canada joined in 1948; Australia and New Zealand in 1956. Each partner runs the national agency that does the work: the NSA in the United States, GCHQ in Britain, the CSE in Canada, the ASD in Australia, and the GCSB in New Zealand.
Dividing the planet
The practical arrangement is a division of labor across the globe. Each member takes primary responsibility for intercepting communications in its own region, then feeds the results into a shared pool: Britain and its listening posts cover much of Europe, Africa, and western Russia; Australia and New Zealand watch South and East Asia and the Pacific; the United States handles much of the rest. Because the take is pooled, a station in New Zealand can collect a signal that lands on an American analyst's desk within hours. The name itself is usually traced to a classification stamp on documents cleared for all five, "AUS/CAN/NZ/UK/US EYES ONLY," shortened over time to Five Eyes.
Reach and controversy
The 2013 disclosures by Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor, exposed the scale of what the alliance had built: programs to tap undersea fiber-optic cables, harvest metadata on billions of phone calls, and vacuum up internet traffic worldwide, from the NSA's PRISM to GCHQ's Tempora. The leaks also sharpened an old criticism. Because each government is legally restricted in how it may spy on its own citizens, critics allege the partners can sidestep those limits by asking an ally to do the collecting and then sharing the result: surveillance by proxy. The members deny running any such loophole. Whatever the truth, the reach is real, and it has widened. On issues from Chinese telecom equipment to Russian operations, Five Eyes increasingly acts as a single diplomatic bloc, coordinating not just intelligence but policy.
The alliance endures because trust of this depth cannot be manufactured on demand; it was built over eighty years of shared war, language, law, and habit. That is also its limit. When Washington floats widening the circle, a "Six Eyes" that might add Japan, the very intimacy that makes the club work is exactly what makes it so hard to expand.