General Assembly vote · November 10, 1975

How countries voted on Resolution 3379, which called Zionism a form of racism

On November 10, 1975, the General Assembly adopted Resolution 3379 by 72 in favor, 35 against, with 32 abstentions. Its single operative paragraph determined that "zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination." On December 16, 1991, the Assembly revoked that determination by adopting Resolution 46/86 by 111 to 25, with 13 abstentions.

Resolution A/RES/3379(XXX) · UN Digital Library · Updated October 2026

Yes
72
No
35
Abstained
32
Didn't vote
3

Adopted: it needed more yes votes than no votes, and abstentions count for neither side.

World map of how each country voted on Resolution 3379: Zionism and racism, November 10, 1975
  • Yes
  • No
  • Abstained
  • Didn't vote
  • Not a UN member

Which countries voted against?

The 35 no votes came from Western Europe (France, the United Kingdom, West Germany, and 11 other states), the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Israel, and 10 states in Latin America and the Caribbean: the Bahamas, Barbados, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, and Uruguay. Five African states also voted no: the Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Malawi, and Swaziland.

How did the big powers vote?

Why did the Assembly pass it in 1975?

Through 1975, three international meetings adopted texts linking Zionism to racism. The Declaration of Mexico, adopted at the World Conference of the International Women's Year (June 19 to July 2), listed zionism with colonialism, apartheid and racial discrimination as things to be eliminated. A resolution of the Organization of African Unity, adopted in Kampala (July 28 to August 1), said the regimes in "occupied Palestine", Zimbabwe and South Africa had "a common imperialist origin." A declaration of Non-Aligned foreign ministers in Lima (August 25 to 30) condemned zionism "as a threat to world peace and security."

Somalia introduced the draft on October 16, 1975 in the Third Committee. It ended with 26 sponsors: 20 Arab League members, plus Afghanistan, Cuba, Dahomey, Guinea, Mali, and the Ukrainian SSR. On October 17, 1975, the Committee adopted it 70 to 29, with 27 abstentions.

At the plenary on November 10, Belgium moved to defer the text to the next session. That motion failed 67 to 55, with 15 abstentions. The Assembly then adopted Resolution 3379 by 72 to 35, with 32 abstentions.

1975 and 1991
  • Resolution 3379: Zionism called racismNov 1975 72 yes35 no32 abstained
  • Resolution 46/86: the revocationDec 1991 111 yes25 no13 abstained

What did Israel and the United States say?

Chaim Herzog, Israel's Permanent Representative, spoke before the vote on November 10, 1975. He called the resolution "based on hatred, falsehood and arrogance" and said: "For us, the Jewish people, this is no more than a piece of paper, and we shall treat it as such." He then tore the text of the resolution in half at the podium.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the United States Permanent Representative, spoke after the vote. "The United States rises to declare before the General Assembly ... that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act," he said. He said: "The lie is that zionism is a form of racism. The overwhelmingly clear truth is that it is not."

What did the resolution's supporters say?

Fayez Sayegh, Kuwait's representative, argued that the label fit Israel's laws. "A country in which there is a law called the Law of Return, permitting a Jew who has never been to Palestine to 'return', and a policy prohibiting a Palestinian from actually returning to his home... how can the label of racism and racial discrimination be questioned...?" he said on November 10, 1975. He added: "We revere the Jewish faith."

Jamil Baroody, Saudi Arabia's representative, replied to Moynihan after the vote, asking: "But we are liars, 72 liars? Do you have a monopoly of the truth?" He said: "We have no quarrel with Judaism. But it was European Jews who started this movement... They used Judaism, a noble religion, for a political and economic end."

Why was it revoked in 1991?

On September 23, 1991, President George H.W. Bush called for repeal in his address to the General Assembly. He cited the Charter's pledge "to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors" and said: "UNGA Resolution 3379, the so-called 'Zionism is racism' resolution, mocks this pledge and the principles upon which the United Nations was founded. And I call now for its repeal."

The end of the Cold War changed many governments' votes. The Soviet Union, which had voted yes in 1975, co-sponsored the revocation. East European states that had supported the original resolution under communist governments now backed repeal. The draft had 86 co-sponsors.

Yemen moved to require a two-thirds majority for passage. That motion was rejected 96 to 34. The Assembly then adopted Resolution 46/86 by 111 to 25, with 13 abstentions. Revocations by the Assembly are rare. In 1950, Resolution 386 (V) revoked two recommendations on Spain contained in a 1946 resolution.

Khalil Makkawi of Lebanon, speaking for the Arab Group, warned that revocation "would set a dangerous precedent which could render other United Nations resolutions no longer morally and politically binding." Cuba's representative, Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada, said the United States had acted "for petty domestic reasons... using a level of pressure and disinformation that is quite extraordinary."

The 25 no votes came from 13 Arab states, seven Muslim-majority states in Asia (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Brunei, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, and Pakistan), Mali, and four other states: Cuba, North Korea, Sri Lanka, and Viet Nam.

From 1975 to 1991Names as in 1991. Germany's seat was West Germany's in 1975.

No→Yes35

  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Bahamas
  • Barbados
  • Belgium
  • Canada
  • Central African Republic
  • Costa Rica
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Denmark
  • Dominican Republic
  • El Salvador
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Liberia
  • Luxembourg
  • Malawi
  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Norway
  • Panama
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Uruguay

Abstained→Yes26

  • Argentina
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Botswana
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Ecuador
  • Gabon
  • Greece
  • Guatemala
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Kenya
  • Lesotho
  • Nepal
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • Togo
  • Venezuela
  • Zaire
  • Zambia

Yes→No22

  • Afghanistan
  • Algeria
  • Bangladesh
  • Cuba
  • Indonesia
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Jordan
  • Lebanon
  • Libya
  • Malaysia
  • Mali
  • Mauritania
  • Pakistan
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Somalia
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Syria
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Yemen

Yes→Abstained5

  • Laos
  • Maldives
  • Tanzania
  • Turkey
  • Uganda

Unchanged: 30 yes both times, 6 abstained both times. Countries that didn't vote on one of the two, or weren't members yet, are left out.

How did each region vote?

Africa provided the largest bloc of yes votes at 28, followed by the Middle East at 14 and Europe at 13. In the Americas, 12 voted no, 11 abstained and 5 voted yes. All 3 no votes in Oceania came from Australia, New Zealand, and Fiji.

Votes by regionNovember 10, 1975
  • Europe30 countries 13 yes14 no1 abstained
  • Americas28 countries 5 yes12 no11 abstained
  • Asia19 countries 12 yes0 no7 abstained
  • Oceania4 countries 0 yes3 no1 abstained
  • Middle East15 countries 14 yes1 no0 abstained
  • Africa46 countries 28 yes5 no12 abstained

What did the resolution say?

  • The preamble recalled the 1963 Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which stated that "any doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous."
  • It recalled a 1973 resolution that "condemned, inter alia, the unholy alliance between South African racism and zionism."
  • It took note of the Declaration of Mexico, adopted in 1975 by the World Conference of the International Women's Year, which said international co-operation and peace require "the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, zionism, apartheid and racial discrimination in all its forms."
  • It took note of an Organization of African Unity resolution from Kampala (1975), which found "that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regimes in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a common imperialist origin..."
  • It took note of the political declaration of the Non-Aligned foreign ministers' conference in Lima (1975), which "most severely condemned zionism as a threat to world peace and security and called upon all countries to oppose this racist and imperialist ideology."
  • The single operative paragraph stated: "Determines that zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

How did every country vote?

How every country voted on Resolution 3379: Zionism and racism
CountryRegionVote
AfghanistanAsiaYes
AlbaniaEuropeYes
AlgeriaAfricaYes
ArgentinaAmericasAbstained
AustraliaOceaniaNo
AustriaEuropeNo
BahamasAmericasNo
BahrainMiddle EastYes
BangladeshAsiaYes
BarbadosAmericasNo
BelgiumEuropeNo
BhutanAsiaAbstained
BoliviaAmericasAbstained
BotswanaAfricaAbstained
BrazilAmericasYes
BulgariaEuropeYes
BurmaAsiaAbstained
BurundiAfricaYes
Byelorussian SSREuropeYes
CambodiaAsiaYes
CameroonAfricaYes
CanadaAmericasNo
Cape VerdeAfricaYes
Central African RepublicAfricaNo
ChadAfricaYes
ChileAmericasAbstained
ChinaAsiaYes
ColombiaAmericasAbstained
Costa RicaAmericasNo
CubaAmericasYes
CyprusEuropeYes
CzechoslovakiaEuropeYes
DahomeyAfricaYes
DenmarkEuropeNo
Dominican RepublicAmericasNo
East GermanyEuropeYes
EcuadorAmericasAbstained
EgyptAfricaYes
El SalvadorAmericasNo
Equatorial GuineaAfricaYes
EthiopiaAfricaAbstained
FijiOceaniaNo
FinlandEuropeNo
FranceEuropeNo
GabonAfricaAbstained
GambiaAfricaYes
GhanaAfricaAbstained
GreeceEuropeAbstained
GrenadaAmericasYes
GuatemalaAmericasAbstained
GuineaAfricaYes
Guinea-BissauAfricaYes
GuyanaAmericasYes
HaitiAmericasNo
HondurasAmericasNo
HungaryEuropeYes
IcelandEuropeNo
IndiaAsiaYes
IndonesiaAsiaYes
IranMiddle EastYes
IraqMiddle EastYes
IrelandEuropeNo
IsraelMiddle EastNo
ItalyEuropeNo
Ivory CoastAfricaNo
JamaicaAmericasAbstained
JapanAsiaAbstained
JordanMiddle EastYes
KenyaAfricaAbstained
KuwaitMiddle EastYes
LaosAsiaYes
LebanonMiddle EastYes
LesothoAfricaAbstained
LiberiaAfricaNo
LibyaAfricaYes
LuxembourgEuropeNo
MadagascarAfricaYes
MalawiAfricaNo
MalaysiaAsiaYes
MaldivesAsiaYes
MaliAfricaYes
MaltaEuropeYes
MauritaniaAfricaYes
MauritiusAfricaAbstained
MexicoAmericasYes
MongoliaAsiaYes
MoroccoAfricaYes
MozambiqueAfricaYes
NepalAsiaAbstained
NetherlandsEuropeNo
New ZealandOceaniaNo
NicaraguaAmericasNo
NigerAfricaYes
NigeriaAfricaYes
North YemenMiddle EastYes
NorwayEuropeNo
OmanMiddle EastYes
PakistanAsiaYes
PanamaAmericasNo
Papua New GuineaOceaniaAbstained
ParaguayAmericasAbstained
PeruAmericasAbstained
PhilippinesAsiaAbstained
PolandEuropeYes
PortugalEuropeYes
QatarMiddle EastYes
Republic of the CongoAfricaYes
RomaniaEuropeDidn't vote
RwandaAfricaYes
São Tomé and PríncipeAfricaYes
Saudi ArabiaMiddle EastYes
SenegalAfricaYes
Sierra LeoneAfricaAbstained
SingaporeAsiaAbstained
SomaliaAfricaYes
South AfricaAfricaDidn't vote
South YemenMiddle EastYes
Soviet UnionEuropeYes
SpainEuropeDidn't vote
Sri LankaAsiaYes
SudanAfricaYes
SwazilandAfricaNo
SwedenEuropeNo
SyriaMiddle EastYes
TanzaniaAfricaYes
ThailandAsiaAbstained
TogoAfricaAbstained
Trinidad and TobagoAmericasAbstained
TunisiaAfricaYes
TurkeyMiddle EastYes
UgandaAfricaYes
Ukrainian SSREuropeYes
United Arab EmiratesMiddle EastYes
United KingdomEuropeNo
United StatesAmericasNo
Upper VoltaAfricaAbstained
UruguayAmericasNo
VenezuelaAmericasAbstained
West GermanyEuropeNo
YugoslaviaEuropeYes
ZaireAfricaAbstained
ZambiaAfricaAbstained
All UN votes →
7 days free cancel anytime
Get the app